Coping with Inconsistencies in Legal Reasoning
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Defeasible reasoning with legal conditionals.
Valid conclusions can be defeated if people can think of conditions that prevent the consequent to occur although the antecedent is given. The goal of the present research was to investigate how people consider these conditions when reasoning with legal conditionals such as "If a person kills another human, then this person should be punished for manslaughter." In Experiments 1 and 2 legal cond...
متن کاملReasoning with Inconsistencies in Propositional Peer-to-Peer Inference Systems
In a peer-to-peer inference system, there is no centralized control or hierarchical organization: each peer is equivalent in functionality and cooperates with other peers in order to solve a collective reasoning task. Since peer theories model possibly different viewpoints, even if each local theory is consistent, the global theory may be inconsistent. We exhibit a distributed algorithm detecti...
متن کاملReasoning with inconsistencies in hybrid MKNF knowledge bases
This paper is concerned with the handling of inconsistencies occurring in the combination of description logics and rules, especially in hybrid MKNF knowledge bases. More precisely, we present a paraconsistent semantics for hybrid MKNF knowledge bases (called para-MKNF knowledge bases) based on four-valued logic as proposed by Belnap. We also reduce this paraconsistent semantics to the stable m...
متن کاملExamples in Legal Reasoning: Legal Hypotheticals
This paper discusses examples, p a r t i c u l a r l y hypo the t i ca ls , t he i r use and generat ion, in legal reasoning. It examines the use of sequences of hypo the t i ca ls .
متن کاملArgumentation in Legal Reasoning
A popular view of what Artificial Intelligence can do for lawyers is that it can do no more than deduce the consequences from a precisely stated set of facts and legal rules. This immediately makes many lawyers sceptical about the usefulness of such systems: this mechanical approach seems to leave out most of what is important in legal reasoning. A case does not appear as a set of facts, but ra...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Logic, argumentation & reasoning
سال: 2021
ISSN: ['2214-9139', '2214-9120']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70084-3_17